Author
ITC – Begoña Arenas
Mini Project ID
ITCMPFRUIT
Description
The committee of the fruit company wants to use some interesting messages to let their consumers better know about Persimmon.
Sector
General
Data
They want to use the following data in their company blog and social networks:
The yellow-orange persimmon fruit is an excellent source of fiber, Vitamin A (it contains carotene and cryptoxanthin, both with provitamin A activity, very interesting nutritionally) and a high level of vitamin C, vitamin B6, potassium and the mineral manganese. Persimmons are fat-free and are a good source of healthy carbohydrates and natural sugar. They have an antioxidant activity with beneficial effects, as they decrease the risk of certain degenerative diseases (cancer, cardiovascular, diabetes, cancer, and neurological conditions like Alzheimer’s etc.).
Is this information reliable?
It can be retrieved from: https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/persimmon-nutrition-benefits
Model
We can use THE CRAAP test worksheet
Use the following list to help you evaluate sources. Answer the questions as appropriate, and then rank each of the 5 parts from 1 to 10 (1 = unreliable, 10 = excellent). Add up the scores to give you an idea of whether you should use the resource (and whether your boss would want you to!).
Currency: the timeliness of the information
- When was the information published or posted?
- Has the information been revised or updated?
- Is the information current or out of date for your topic?
- Are the links functional?
Relevance: the importance of the information for your needs
- Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question?
- Who is the intended audience? Audience interested in health issues
- Is the information at an appropriate level?
- Have you looked at a variety of sources before choosing this one?
- Would you be comfortable using this source for a research paper?
Authority: the source of the information:
- Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor?
- Are the author’s credentials or organizational affiliations given?
- What are the author’s credentials or organizational affiliations given?
- What are the author’s qualifications to write on the topic?
- Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address?
- Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?
Accuracy: the reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the content
- Where does the information come from?
- Is the information supported by evidence?
- Has the information been reviewed or refereed?
- Can you verify any of the information in another source?
- Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion?
- Are there spelling, grammar, or other typographical errors?
Purpose: the reason the information exists
- What is the purpose of the information?
- Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear?
- Is the information fact? opinion? Propaganda?
- Does the point of view appear objective and impartial?
- Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases?
Calculation
- 45 – 50 Excellent
- 40 – 44 Good
- 35 – 39 Average
- 30 – 34 Borderline Acceptable
- Below 30 – Unacceptable
Review M2S3 – DUCK Persimmon Fruit.
You must be logged in to post a review.